 |
| Photo Ken Hill
|
 |
| The Cycad Pages
| | Cycas macrocarpa
| |
- Cycas macrocarpa Griff., Not. Pl. Asiat. 4: 11-14, pl. 362, fig. 2 (1854).
- TYPE: Malaysia, between Ayer Pannas and Tabong, Griffith, East India Company Herbarium no. 6361 (holo K).
 |
| Photo Ken Hill
|
Etymology:
From the Greek makros, large, and karpos, fruit.
Literature:
Hill 1995b
Illustrations:
Griffith 1854.
Historical notes:
C. macrocarpa was described by William Griffith (1810--1845),
a British colonial physician with the East India Company, and
later botanist and superintendent of the Calcutta Botanic Gardens.
He noted that the specimen was collected by Dutchman J.B. Westerhout,
Assistant Resident of Malacca, in September 1842. Griffith did
not publish his notes and drawings while living, and his work
was bequeathed to the East India Company. It was compiled by John
McLelland and published by the colonial government of Bengal in
Calcutta in 1854, and included an illustration Griffith made while
at the Calcutta Botanic Gardens. Although there was nothing to
indicate that the illustration belonged to the description of
C. macrocarpa, the compiler added a note to suggest that
this may be the case, and it clearly matches the description and
the specimen at Kew.
This publication was fully technically correct, but it was
ignored by all contemporaneous and subsequent cycad students.
Foremost student of the Cycadales of that era, F.A.W. Miquel,
overlooked the publication of the name C. macrocarpa until
1868, where he briefly mentioned it as a species unknown to him
and doubtfully distinct. Alphonse de Candolle and his father collated,
partly wrote and published a complete account of the known flora
of the world over the period 1824--1876. He treated the cycads
in 1868, including the name C. macrocarpa as a doubtful
species, and noting that it was not known to him. In the Kew herbarium,
the specimens collected by Westerhout were labelled C. rumphii
and left at that. Hooker and Jackson in 1893 placed C. macrocarpa
into the synonymy of C. rumphii in `Index Kewensis', a
monumental publication endeavouring to list all published plant
names and synonymies from the time of Linnaeus until 1885. There
it has remained until now.
Although apparently fairly common in the ridge forests of southern
Thailand and Peninsular Malaysia, C. macrocarpa has been
rarely collected. Henry Ridley (director of Singapore Botanic
Gardens, 1901--1912) published the Flora of the Malay Peninsula
between 1922 and 1925, in which he noted `hill forest forms of
C. rumphii may be different'. Tem Smitinand later recognised
the presence of 2 distinct taxa in southern Thailand in his treatment
of Cycas for the Flora of Thailand. He correctly treated one as C.
rumphii, but wrongly applied the name C. circinalis
to the plants we now know to be C. macrocarpa. A photograph
in habitat was published in `Nature Malaysiana' as C. sp. Taman
Negara (vol. 17, p. 47, 1992).
Distinguishing features:
Distinguished by the long, pungent, narrowly triangular cataphylls with
thick, woolly, rusty red-brown indumentum, the distinctly blue
new growth. Leaflets are
dark green when mature, narrow-based (2--4 mm wide at the base),
with a narrow, raised, green midrib above.
Distribution and habitat:
These cycads originally occurred in primary closed forest (rainforest),
on well-drained, often sloping, deep sandy clay-loam soils, and
are said to still occur on the less disturbed ridges in southern
Thailand and northern Malaysia.
Conservation status:
This species has suffered extensive habitat reduction that is ongoing,
and must be regarded as vulnerable
IUCN (1994)
Red List status VU A2c.
 |
| Photo Willie Tang
|
 |
| Photo Ken Hill
|
Description:
Stems arborescent, to 12 m tall.
Leaves deep green, highly glossy, 220-320 cm long, flat (not keeled) in section (opposing leaflets inserted at 180° on rachis), with 160-220 leaflets, orange to brown, tomentum shedding as leaf expands; rachis usually terminated by paired leaflets. Petiole 40-70 cm long (15-25% of total leaf), petiole glabrous, spinescent for 80-100% of length. Basal leaflets not gradually reducing to spines, 150-250 mm long.
Median leaflets simple, strongly discolorous, 240-450 mm long, 12-18 mm wide, inserted at 60-85° to rachis, decurrent for 5-12 mm, narrowed to 3-4 mm at base (to 15-30% of maximum width), 15-35 mm apart on rachis; median leaflets section flat; margins flat to slightly recurved; apex acute, not spinescent; midrib raised above, raised below.
Cataphylls linear, pungent, pilose, 70-170 mm long, persistent.
Pollen cones ovoid, orange, 16-22 cm long, 9-12 cm diam.; microsporophyll lamina firm, not dorsiventrally thickened, 24-50 mm long, 14-20 mm wide, fertile zone 18-44 mm long, sterile apex 5-6 mm long, level, apical spine prominent to rudimentary, sharply upturned, 9-28 mm long.
Megasporophylls 10-33 cm long, brown-tomentose; ovules 2-4, glabrous; lamina lanceolate, 50-100 mm long, 17-45 mm wide, shallowly pectinate, with 10-22 pungent lateral spines 5-18 mm long, 1-2.5 mm wide, apical spine distinct from lateral spines, 17-60 mm long, 2-7 mm wide at base.
Seeds oblong, 45-65 mm long, 35-45 mm wide; sarcotesta yellow, not pruinose or slightly pruinose, 3-5 mm thick; fibrous layer present; sclerotesta smooth. Spongy endocarp absent.